Knows Who Is Who? What an Indian Politics?
Darshan’s son made a cop, Panthics
plead family to return govt ‘aid’
Sikh leaders pay tributes to shooting victim
Were they all not in field, to divide Sikhs
for the political reasons with the support of the agencies?
are not with the government?
may say or claim that they are with the centre or state, politically
one and the same thing?
they all, former Jathedar of the Akal Takht, Bhai Ranjit Singh,
president of SAD( Amritsar), Simranjeet Singh Mann, president of
Delhi Sikh Gurdawara Management committee, Paramjit Singh Sarna,
Damdami Taksal head, Baba Harnam Singh Dhuma, Baba Ranjit Singh
Dhadrianwala, Satnam Singh Paonta Sahib of Dal Khalsa and Baba
Sarabjot Singh Bedi of Sant Samaj etc, not in field, to divide Sikhs
for the political reasons with the support of the agencies and
always politically and financially benefited directly or indirectly
Gurpreet Singh son of Darshan Singh rightly accepted the government
job in police, and thereby, gave a strong message to the
opportunists that such death would never be cashed by anyone
now, in return, in the present situation, the leaders of the various
organizations may withdraw their announced financial assistance.
Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
How much more can you divide India, asks
New and Renewable Energy Minister Farooq
Abdullah pretending himself more patriot falsely
States are always necessity of any unmanaged country especially like
India and there is no need to do politics by the hypocrites, on the
issue of creation of further smaller States within India.
of India in its bigger states is unmanageable, uncontrollable,
unregulated, so, better to have smaller toothless states, to keep
India forcibly united and manageable under the unitary form of
union minister Farooq Abdullah should not
oppose the move and the demand of smaller states, to pretend himself
more patriot falsely.
The more powerless states never meant for dividing India under the
knew very well that any of the Chief Ministers in India can do
nothing of his own and has to work under “some powers” when he has
already confessed the reality and created flutter by claiming that
“some powers” had prevented him from probing the massacre of 35
Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in 2000 on the eve of Bill Clinton’s visit
Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
The 1984 Massacre of Sikhs
The Guilty Of
Engineering and Abetting the 1984 Massacre of Sikhs Be Prosecuted
After the Investigation in the Pending Cases
Was the then entire government machinery not to be held responsible
and guilty of engineering and abetting the 1984 massacre of Sikhs,
the State- Sponsored Violence against Sikhs and be prosecuted under
section 120-B of IPC etc after the investigation in the pending
Are all the criminals responsible for the `genocide of Sikhs' or the
`State-Sponsored Violence' against Sikhs not be allowed to take the
plea in defence of the then PM (Rajiv Gandhi) who almost
rationalized the killing,''?
Was the then PM Rajiv Gandhi not the main accused for the `genocide
of Sikhs' or the `State-Sponsored Violence' against Sikhs?
Whether in case, the main accused (Rajiv Gandhi) stands killed by a
‘Human Bomb’, the other co-accused, who remained the part and parcel
of the then entire government machinery, responsible for the
`genocide of Sikhs' or the `State-Sponsored Violence' against Sikhs,
were exempted in the investigation or can not be prosecuted after
the investigation in the pending cases, now?
Because, the justice
is being denied, intentionally and deliberately, as experienced,
then, under the circumstances, every possibility could to be seen as
impossibility in India.
An Opinion by:
Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
Please Click To Read More...>Here
The Indypendent » 1984 Remembered: Cartoonist
Draws on 25 Years of ...
"When a big tree falls the earth shakes a little"
by Rajiv Gandhi, in the immediate aftermath of the