Panjabi Section |   Download Panjabi Font |   Author  |  Founder  |  Contact  |  Feedback

 
     
     
  Index  
     
  Home  
     
  Current Issues  
     
  Religio Politics  
     
  General  
     
  My India!  
     
  Personalities  
 

Welcome to the Sikh Vichar Manch-Thought Provoking Forum for Justice

 
 


CM Narendra Modi was a main actor in the carnage eight years backhttp://www.emgonline.co.uk/news.php?news=9211
The Sikh Times, UK
 - Balbir Singh Sooch 

AS A politician, Gujarat State Chief Minister Narendra Modi may be looking bold after facing the Special Investigation Team (SIT), ...

Tue, Mar 30, 2010 9:56:02
http://www.emgonline.co.uk/news.php?news=9202 

 

CM Narendra Modi was a main actor in the carnage eight years back
By Balbir Singh Sooch

AS A politician, Gujarat State Chief Minister Narendra Modi may be looking bold after facing the Special Investigation Team (SIT), but factually, he can’t be so, provided questioned seriously for more than nine hours. Whether the method of questioning to CM Narendra Modi was same as could be adopted for a person holding position like him?

To my mind, by way of questioning or cross-examination of the accused regarding his all movements during the period, background, ideology etc then cross checking his statement with the statements of his other accomplices to find out omissions and commissions and again repeating the process, to bring the truth on surface, is not difficult. Though the process is very time consuming and lengthy and can not be a success without impartial action and expertise knowledge.

CM Narendra Modi was a main actor in the carnage eight years back.

Questioning him on the above lines i.e. ‘by way of questioning or cross-examination of the accused regarding his all movements during the period, background, ideology etc then cross checking his statement with the statements of his other accomplices to find out omissions and commissions and again repeating the process, to bring the truth on surface, is not difficult’.

In fact, nine hours period for questioning to Modi by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) was very less and nothing for the purpose in this case.

As a lawyer, I am always of the opinion that certainly truth could be brought out on surface without any bodily torture. I also realized many a times as to how I might have tortured mentally by way of questioning or cross-examination in the court to the persons who complained me without any grudge considering that was my professional duty in order to bring truth on surface for justice for my client.

SIT Chief R.K. Raghavan was also not present in his office when Mr. Modi appeared. The media, who earlier started raising hue and cry regarding the delay and the injustice in similar cases in the country and openly said the process adopted for summoning Modi for investigation by SIT is only eyewash, was also moderate later on or was asked to keep quite, when Modi was back at SIT office for further questioning i.e. for remaining part of the drama.

A congress leader as spokesman heard saying, “We are not interested in the out-come of the investigation, but legal process be completed and words to that effect.” The protest on the part of BJP for questioning CM Modi in the manner by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) was also negligible and that all was clearly indicating that both parties (BJP & Congress) are hands in glove, not only in this case, otherwise also, they are one and the same thing, and the minorities were being befooled in India, leaving them at the mercy of God.

Now, if someone concludes that Chief Minister Narendra Modi was bold being clean or not guilty must be taken wrongly and suspiciously and the entire process being followed as a part of high level enacted and stage managed big drama in this case as eyewash.

After watching the news for about one and half hour, the picture was clear about the drama, and I sent an email on March 27, 2010 2:06 PM (IST), “Was the questioning by the Supreme court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) to CM Modi now after eight years only in connection with a complaint of Zakia Jaffery, widow of former Congress MP Eshan Jaffery, who was killed in Gulbarg society massacre (riots) case of 2002 that he (then also CM Modi) had instructed officers not to take action, to be considered an eyewash as reports are pouring in so far?”

Chief Minister Narendra Modi and the Supreme court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) ???

SIT Chief Parries Questions on Narendra Modi's Claim:

Was there any patch up about fixing next date of hearing, replacing the summons with a letter asking Narendra Modi to appear on March 27, 2010 when he, intentionally and deliberately, failed to appear on March 21, 2010 before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) as it appears? 

If answer is yes, then who were the parties to the patch up business and for getting issued the letter for a fresh date i.e. March 27, 2010 for the presence of Modi for questioning him?

Did the influence and pressure apply only for seeking adjournment to the next date and changing summons into letter or and the influence and pressure as a business also worked beyond it?

Whether after questioning Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi for more than nine hours in two sessions, the entire case also likely to remain unactioned without going into its history?  

No-doubt, whatever the Supreme Court says is law.  

Is the prosecution story always not based on the investigation conducted by the investigating officer (I.O.) and even the Supreme Court can not make any additions of its own in the story while deciding the case under the law?

Whether the questionnaire was prepared by the SIT or by the Supreme court in this case?

Obviously, it may be the task of the SIT only. 

Can all these queries not to be answered openly and be made part of the investigation being conducted by SIT in this case?

Averting the flashpoint

http://dailymailnews.com/0310/30/Editorial_Column/DMColumn.php

Investigating Modi is merely an eyewash

CM Narendra Modi was a main actor in the carnage eight years backhttp://www.emgonline.co.uk/news.php?news=9211

Updated:

Commissions of injustice

Khushwant Singh About Modi

Saturday, April 3, 2010

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100403/saturday/above.htm

“Then we had pogroms of Muslims in Gujarat, following the burning of a rail coach along with passengers at the Godhra railway station in 2002. Over 2,000 innocent Muslims, including a former MP, were killed.

There is plenty of recorded evidence made through a sting operation by Tehalka that Modi himself gave the green signal to vandals to do what they liked to Muslims for three days, and teach them a lesson without bothering about the police. Goondas took the law into their own hands and went on a killing spree.

No action was taken against Modi, who had a stout protector in LK Advani because Advani depended on Modi to return him to Parliament.

Instead, Modi was praised for his good administration and as a promoter of industry. Ratan Tata shifted his Nano-manufacturing plant from West Bengal to Gujarat. Other industrialists lauded him for containing trade unions.”

 

 
Books
Cry for Justice
Letters
Human Rights
  Poetry  
     
  Links  
     
  All Headlines  
     
     
 
Index  |  Home  |  Panjabi Section  |  Author  |  Founder  |  Feedback  |  Links

Copyright © Balbir Singh Sooch, Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch, Ludhana, Punjab (India)