Sikhs Can’t Be Anti-India Or None Else
- By Balbir Singh Sooch
Sikhs have to take and demand their share as their ‘Sikh Rights’
finally out of India only. When, the Sikh Vichar Manch says, “Hindu
hatred against the Sikh and Muslim minorities is the root cause for
the constant genocide. A Sikh Sovereign State is the only answer for
the calamity fallen upon the Sikhs. We, again thank him (then Mr.
Bill Clinton the President of USA Washington) for the interest taken
in Sikh Rights” only conveys Sikhs pending desires and aspirations.
But, when the
same slogan or demand, ‘A Sikh Sovereign State or the demand of Sikh
Rights’ was and is being raised at the instance of the Indian
government agencies, it has altogether a different meaning and the
slogan or demand of ‘A Sikh Sovereign State’ being used like a
double edged weapon to eliminate and defame Sikhs, leveling them as
the separatists and anti-India.
Sikhs are one of
the co-sharers in India and thus can not be anti-India.
As to how Sikhs
can be anti to their native land i.e. India as one of the co-sharers
so-called nationalists in power or without power in India level any
co-sharer in India as an enemy or anti-India, let it be Sikhs or
Muslims or someone else as a class, may be minority or majority
community, then, such leveled co-sharer for his own maximum benefits
in India has legal right to get his share partitioned out of the
jointly held land i.e. India.
It is the legal
spirit, position and theme within the rule of law under the
Constitution of India as far as, I understand law of the land and
the Sikh Vichar Manch always advancing Sikhs claim of ‘Sikhs Rights’
can’t be anti-India, because they (Sikhs) have to take and demand
their share as their ‘Sikh Rights’ finally out of India.
Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch