Welcome to the Sikh Vichar Manch-Thought Provoking Forum for Justice

A Tested ‘Political Revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal
 

Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies: What These Mean For Indians?

A Tested ‘Political Revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal

Submission By: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch

A Tested ‘Political Revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal

1. In the context of Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies: Indians should not forget the lengthy and the worst period of slavery of India and the “Historical examinations of slavery in India have largely emphasized the intensification or growth of this institution during the period of Muslim control of northern India.

2. During colonial time many Indians were taken into different parts of the world as slaves by British Raj. Slavery was abolished in the British Empire with the passage of the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 and criminalized in the British Raj in the Indian Penal Code of 1861” From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

3. The Daily O discussed the matter very rationally-sensibly, logically under the head, ‘Arvind Kejriwal's apology to Majithia: What it means for AAP in Punjab’, but it is also required to be seen the ‘Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies: What These Mean For Indians?’ by the legal and political experts in detail but not or like as only now Punjab Leadership of AAP agitating against a tested ‘Political revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal for the reasons best known to them and as a whole to “Punjab Leadership” under the prevailing system in India though different than the lengthy and the worst period of slavery of India as quoted above.

4. The author of this critical note, Balbir Singh Sooch as a layman justify the Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies under the prevailing system in India after the so-called independence of India and wish to quote his comments in the matter here:

WHY INDIA IS DEVOID OF RULE OF LAW?

5. Balbir Singh Sooch personally is under debt of Dr Harish Khare’s services as his being ‘The Editor-in-Chief of The Tribune Group of Publications’ as experienced and adjudged him, Learned Dr Harish Khare Sahib, from only positive angle without any question mark so far, but not or like as now Punjab Leadership of AAP agitating against a tested ‘Political revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal for the reasons best known to them and as a whole to Punjab Leadership.

6. Law is always above the religions and imperfect humans as a net result stands established in the world so far, but the laws are being misused openly here and defaming our India. We have always to speak legally by maintaining the discipline within law to escape from the system operating and manipulating laws unjustly in India.

7. Please do remember a cautious note or as a notice as already published since long for the benefit of all within and outside India. WHY INDIA IS DEVOID OF RULE OF LAW? http://sikhvicharmanch.com/B1.htm

8. And, Kejriwal apologises to Majithia: It is a good development to end the litigation and similarly others involved in such litigation should feel encouraged to do so: A good sign especially among the politicians involved with each other...otherwise such litigation affects the society in the long run adversely: Thanks by Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch:
https://www.facebook.com/ndtv/videos/vb.102527030797/10156446054890798/?type=2&theater&comment_id=10156446128080798&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic&notif_id=1521130983482222 

The problem with AAP: It is worth to quote here as under:
(i) ‘Having won Delhi twice and with a victory of sorts in Punjab, the BJP and Congress privately conceded that AAP was a real looming threat. Many say, at that time, Kejriwal should have slithered up the political ladder quietly.

(ii) A politician is Sukhpal Khera, a former Congressman. But has he shed the Congress ideology or does he still carry it? (What are his views individually as reported and heard about Captain Amarinder Singh and why)?)

(iii) “The problem with AAP: Swaraj Abhiyan founder and former AAP leader Yogendra Yadav calls Kejriwal a dictator. So does Prashant Bhushan. But the dissidence expressed by the AAP MLAs in Punjab proves something to the contrary. AAP seems like a party which to the outsiders looks democratic to a fault. Could Amit Shah the BJP president or Congress supremo Rahul Gandhi have ever been challenged in their respective parties? The answer is no.

(iv) In fact the problem stems from the fact that AAP borrowed or rather converted former bosses in different fields into political leaders. The first crop of AAP leaders were leaders in their own right - former IAS officers, newspaper editors, lawyers, bankers, social workers, poets, psephologists, industrialists and comedians. They had the confidence that comes from facing the big stage and speaking to the gallery. They peppered the day-to-day politics with experiences and assets of their own fields and expertise. They took established political parties head-on.

(v) The next lot of leaders were the disgruntled elements from other parties. It won't be inappropriate to borrow a term from journalism and call many of these politicians including Kejriwal, "freelance politicians". While Kejriwal may have an ideology, which seemingly is Left liberal, most Punjab leaders do not. Bhagwant Mann, is a former comedian, who still uses the art in public speeches. His speeches reflect art but not an ideology.

(vi) Kanwar Sandhu is a former newspaper editor, who knows Punjab like the back of his hand. But that was journalism and this is politics. The only man who fits the bill of a politician is Sukhpal Khera, a former Congressman. But has he shed the Congress ideology or does he still carry it? The rest of them are freelance leaders, who want the good of the state but can't really lay down the roadmap for it. They need an issue to bank upon, probably another drug storm’. The Daily O

9. Said to be and the matter of general discussion always that self stage managed and planned ‘Genocides’ like of Sikhs in 1984 and Muslims endlessly and demolishing of Babri Masjid and winning elections were the targets of the traditional parties, national and regional parties so far conspiringly with peculiar understanding and that is continuing for the lack of awareness in India.

10. Were the Indians feel much different in the prevailing present system after the so-called independence of India than the lengthy and the worst period of slavery of India?

11. The illiterate and simpleton villagers heard saying that the British Raj of whites was much better than the black Indian rulers.

12. The Indians must have awareness and the reasons to understand more than the illiterate and simpleton villagers about ‘Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies’ presently under the system in India: Thanks

13. Added being the most relevant: Again Thanks

http://sikhvicharmanch.com/General-Speaker%20looks%20speak.htm
Speaker Looks Speak Helplessly for Alternative Need Like ‘Federal Poll Front’ For 2019
http://sikhvicharmanch.com/General-Speaker%20looks%20speak.htm 
Submission Responsibly Forwarded By: Balbir Singh Sooch-Sikh Vichar Manch
First Posted On: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 8:37 PM (IST)
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/

https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355

Arvind Kejriwal's Apologies: What These Mean For Indians?
A Tested ‘Political Revolutionary,’ Arvind Kejriwal
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=527&article=16710

http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=16604_0_1_0_C